Are We Measuring the Right Things? Rethinking Success in Educational Leadership

Educational leadership has long been assessed through familiar markers—years in the role, academic qualifications, and progression through leadership pathways. These traditional measures have played an important role in recognising experience and ensuring school leaders have a strong foundation in education.

But as schools face increasing complexity, shifting student needs, and heightened expectations, we need to ask: Are these the only markers of success that matter? Or do we need a broader, more education-specific way of evaluating leadership effectiveness?

Rather than replacing one set of metrics with another, perhaps the real question is how we blend traditional and emerging leadership indicators to reflect the evolving demands of school leadership.

The Changing Role of Educational Leaders

School leadership today extends well beyond managing staff and ensuring curriculum delivery. Principals and system leaders are expected to:

✔ Navigate workforce shortages, staff wellbeing, and retention challenges

✔ Lead through rapid policy and curriculum changes

✔ Foster student engagement, mental health support, and complex community relationships

✔ Balance educational leadership with growing administrative and compliance requirements

With these increasing demands, relying solely on tenure or academic credentials may no longer be enough to define leadership success. But at the same time, education is not a corporate environment, and adopting business-style leadership metrics without considering the educational context could create more problems than solutions.

Read the full article on LinkedIn.